So far, police and army brutality has not gone beyond the usual. That's a plus. But it is a country wide strike of persons in varied sectors of the economy with little communication or considered cooperation yet.
The strikers all have very good reasons and call to strike. Among the various major causes for the strike is the way small set of oligarchic power wielders in Colombia relate to and collude with a set powerful among US power wielder's.
That is US citizens may see the strike as an example of their tax dollars at work.
"As I See It Today" could be the title of this new iteration of my main blog. The "It" would then be the following themes with which I intend to deal here: ~ history ~ politics, economics, government ~ family tree ~ people, places, ~ culture, society ~ dialogue and a bit of me
Search This Blog
Showing posts with label workers. Show all posts
Showing posts with label workers. Show all posts
Sunday, August 25, 2013
Saturday, February 4, 2012
People Power: one
The act of workers uniting for mutual aid was feared and vilified by ruling classes. Workers used the power of unity to motivate rulers to more fairly share with workers the fruits of the labor of workers.
Tuesday, November 9, 2010
Jobs
Jobs are a response to demand.
Demand originates in the great base of workers, citizens, earners.
Money in the hands of that great base translate immediately to demand.
That demand leads to jobs.
Demand originates in the great base of workers, citizens, earners.
Money in the hands of that great base translate immediately to demand.
That demand leads to jobs.
Thursday, November 4, 2010
"Orgnized Labor"
We aren't against organizing.
Still, we aren't that much into labor. We aren't against work, but labor doesn't sound that inviting.
"Organized workers" might be okay, but I have an old uncle who might say "stinking Communists."
"Workers" isn't that much of a turn on either.
Maybe, "organized citizens." Citizens sounds better, but seems a bit broad.
"Knights of Labor" was kind of sexy, but seems a bit dated
What's in a name?
Still, we aren't that much into labor. We aren't against work, but labor doesn't sound that inviting.
"Organized workers" might be okay, but I have an old uncle who might say "stinking Communists."
"Workers" isn't that much of a turn on either.
Maybe, "organized citizens." Citizens sounds better, but seems a bit broad.
"Knights of Labor" was kind of sexy, but seems a bit dated
What's in a name?
Labels:
American citizens,
organized labor,
organizing,
workers
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)